<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KitchenAid Pro 600 Stand Mixer Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cookography.com/2007/kitchenaid-pro-600-stand-mixer-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cookography.com/2007/kitchenaid-pro-600-stand-mixer-review</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.cookography.com/2007/kitchenaid-pro-600-stand-mixer-review/comment-page-1#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cookography.com/?p=21#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>I bought a KitchenAid pro 600.  It started giving me trouble in the first week.  The transmission housing is made of plastic.  This is a stressed part of the driveline.  When this thing cracks all the gears go out of alignment rendering the mixer useless.  I replaced two of these (at 50 bucks a piece) and had to wait 3 weeks for each one.  I ma very disappointed with the KitchenAid.  You can buy this product in some drug stores and Costco as well as many other places.  Quality of an item usually deteriorates when a product is mass marketed such as this one.  

My next mixer is a Viking Pro.  It costs more than the KitchenAid.  A lot more.  I don&#039;t mind paying for quality.    I do not like getting ripped off!  I reluctantly shelled out the money for the Viking.  We have had this machine for 6 months and I swear you could mix cement in it!  The attachments are made of stainless steel, not aluminum like the KitchenAid.  I don&#039;t want aluminum in my bread thank you.  It also has a spot on the back to attach a blender, food processor etc.  In addition it also has the familiar place on the front for a juicer, pasta maker meat grinder etc.  It&#039;s more machines-in one-than the KitchenAid.  The Viking has wheels on the back of it so you can move it around the counter with ease if need be (without scratching anything).  The mixing bowl on the Viking locks in securely at the base and is not suspended by those pins on the KitchenAid that pop out and allow the bowl wobble all over the place when under a hard load.  By all accounts KitchenAid HAD a good name, but they are losing there reputation quickly by producing this current crop of garbage.  The Viking is only available in boutique type kitchen stores.  You wont find it London Drugs, Target or Costco.  There is a reason for that.  Viking wont let there name be tarnished by producing a piece of junk to appeal to a mass market.  Their major appliances are top notch, not like KitchenAid stuff, which are simply Whirpool appliances that have been re-badged and some blinky lights and stainless added. 

I am very happy with the decision I made with the Viking Stand mixer.  My advice...If you have 300 hard saved bucks to spend on a KitchenAid mixer, buy a Sunbeam and take your spouse out to a nice dinner.  If you are truly looking for the next level in a stand mixer, spend a couple of hundred more on the Viking.  Thank-you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a KitchenAid pro 600.  It started giving me trouble in the first week.  The transmission housing is made of plastic.  This is a stressed part of the driveline.  When this thing cracks all the gears go out of alignment rendering the mixer useless.  I replaced two of these (at 50 bucks a piece) and had to wait 3 weeks for each one.  I ma very disappointed with the KitchenAid.  You can buy this product in some drug stores and Costco as well as many other places.  Quality of an item usually deteriorates when a product is mass marketed such as this one.  </p>
<p>My next mixer is a Viking Pro.  It costs more than the KitchenAid.  A lot more.  I don&#8217;t mind paying for quality.    I do not like getting ripped off!  I reluctantly shelled out the money for the Viking.  We have had this machine for 6 months and I swear you could mix cement in it!  The attachments are made of stainless steel, not aluminum like the KitchenAid.  I don&#8217;t want aluminum in my bread thank you.  It also has a spot on the back to attach a blender, food processor etc.  In addition it also has the familiar place on the front for a juicer, pasta maker meat grinder etc.  It&#8217;s more machines-in one-than the KitchenAid.  The Viking has wheels on the back of it so you can move it around the counter with ease if need be (without scratching anything).  The mixing bowl on the Viking locks in securely at the base and is not suspended by those pins on the KitchenAid that pop out and allow the bowl wobble all over the place when under a hard load.  By all accounts KitchenAid HAD a good name, but they are losing there reputation quickly by producing this current crop of garbage.  The Viking is only available in boutique type kitchen stores.  You wont find it London Drugs, Target or Costco.  There is a reason for that.  Viking wont let there name be tarnished by producing a piece of junk to appeal to a mass market.  Their major appliances are top notch, not like KitchenAid stuff, which are simply Whirpool appliances that have been re-badged and some blinky lights and stainless added. </p>
<p>I am very happy with the decision I made with the Viking Stand mixer.  My advice&#8230;If you have 300 hard saved bucks to spend on a KitchenAid mixer, buy a Sunbeam and take your spouse out to a nice dinner.  If you are truly looking for the next level in a stand mixer, spend a couple of hundred more on the Viking.  Thank-you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Boone</title>
		<link>http://www.cookography.com/2007/kitchenaid-pro-600-stand-mixer-review/comment-page-1#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cookography.com/?p=21#comment-586</guid>
		<description>I have two kenwood mixers, a Kitchenaid Artisan And Now
   a Pro 6 and much prefer the Kitchenaids. You made a wise
   choice not buying the viking I used one for two months
   and belive it or not the motor burnt out creaming 
   butter and sugar for a sponge cake. the repair cost £150
   Or about $300 needless to say i didnt bother.
          Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two kenwood mixers, a Kitchenaid Artisan And Now<br />
   a Pro 6 and much prefer the Kitchenaids. You made a wise<br />
   choice not buying the viking I used one for two months<br />
   and belive it or not the motor burnt out creaming<br />
   butter and sugar for a sponge cake. the repair cost £150<br />
   Or about $300 needless to say i didnt bother.<br />
          Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
